Review



agthigh + acti4  (ActiGraph llc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ActiGraph llc agthigh + acti4
    Methods based on mounted equipment to calculate energy expenditure of different activities.
    Agthigh + Acti4, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agthigh+++acti4/acti4+software/pmc04435146-182-3-12
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    agthigh + acti4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings"

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings

    Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

    doi: 10.3390/s150306133

    Methods based on mounted equipment to calculate energy expenditure of different activities.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Methods based on mounted equipment to calculate energy expenditure of different activities.

    Techniques Used: Software, Activity Assay

    Comparisons between measured EE by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated EE by different methods for different activities performed during a standardized protocol.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparisons between measured EE by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated EE by different methods for different activities performed during a standardized protocol.

    Techniques Used:

    Comparisons of EE of stationary and physical activities measured by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated by different methods during a semi-standardized protocol.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparisons of EE of stationary and physical activities measured by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated by different methods during a semi-standardized protocol.

    Techniques Used:

    Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the stationary activity types lying, sitting and standing in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip+Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh+Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), full line the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear correlation plot of the individual scatter plots and R 2 -value ( R 2 ) the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear correlation line.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the stationary activity types lying, sitting and standing in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip+Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh+Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), full line the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear correlation plot of the individual scatter plots and R 2 -value ( R 2 ) the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear correlation line.

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay

    Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the physical activity types walking, running, cycling and walking stairs in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods: ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip + Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh + Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), solid line represents the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear regression between EE by COSMED and difference between EE estimated by different methods and COSMED. R 2 is the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear regression line.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the physical activity types walking, running, cycling and walking stairs in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods: ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip + Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh + Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), solid line represents the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear regression between EE by COSMED and difference between EE estimated by different methods and COSMED. R 2 is the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear regression line.

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay

    Related Articles

    Software:

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings
    Article Snippet: Simultaneously, physical activity was quantified by an ActivPAL 3 , two ActiGraph GT3X+’s and an Actiheart. .. EE was estimated by the standard ActivPAL 3 software (ActivPAL), ActiGraph GT3X+ (ActiGraph) and Actiheart (Actiheart), and by a combination of activity type recognition via Acti4 software and activity counts per minute (CPM) of either a hip- or thigh-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ (AGhip + Acti4 and AGthigh + Acti4). .. At group level, estimated physical activities EE by Actiheart (MSE = 2.05) and AGthigh + Acti4 (MSE = 0.25) were not significantly different from measured EE by indirect calorimetry, while significantly underestimated by ActiGraph, ActivPAL and AGhip + Acti4.

    Activity Assay:

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings
    Article Snippet: Simultaneously, physical activity was quantified by an ActivPAL 3 , two ActiGraph GT3X+’s and an Actiheart. .. EE was estimated by the standard ActivPAL 3 software (ActivPAL), ActiGraph GT3X+ (ActiGraph) and Actiheart (Actiheart), and by a combination of activity type recognition via Acti4 software and activity counts per minute (CPM) of either a hip- or thigh-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ (AGhip + Acti4 and AGthigh + Acti4). .. At group level, estimated physical activities EE by Actiheart (MSE = 2.05) and AGthigh + Acti4 (MSE = 0.25) were not significantly different from measured EE by indirect calorimetry, while significantly underestimated by ActiGraph, ActivPAL and AGhip + Acti4.

    other:

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings
    Article Snippet: The accuracy of AGthigh + Acti4 and Actiheart was better than ActivPAL, ActiGraph and AGhip + Acti4 for estimating physical activity EE at group level in the semi-standardized protocol.

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings
    Article Snippet: AGthigh + Acti4 , ActiGraph GT3X+ CPM from thigh accelerometer activity type recognition from ActiGraph GT3X+ hip and thigh data with Acti4 software linear regressions established in the standardized protocol.



    Similar Products

    agthigh + acti4  (ActiGraph llc)
    90
    ActiGraph llc agthigh + acti4
    Methods based on mounted equipment to calculate energy expenditure of different activities.
    Agthigh + Acti4, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agthigh+++acti4/acti4+software/pmc04435146-182-3-12
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    agthigh + acti4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Methods based on mounted equipment to calculate energy expenditure of different activities.

    Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings

    doi: 10.3390/s150306133

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Methods based on mounted equipment to calculate energy expenditure of different activities.

    Article Snippet: The accuracy of AGthigh + Acti4 and Actiheart was better than ActivPAL, ActiGraph and AGhip + Acti4 for estimating physical activity EE at group level in the semi-standardized protocol.

    Techniques: Software, Activity Assay

    Comparisons between measured EE by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated EE by different methods for different activities performed during a standardized protocol.

    Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings

    doi: 10.3390/s150306133

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons between measured EE by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated EE by different methods for different activities performed during a standardized protocol.

    Article Snippet: The accuracy of AGthigh + Acti4 and Actiheart was better than ActivPAL, ActiGraph and AGhip + Acti4 for estimating physical activity EE at group level in the semi-standardized protocol.

    Techniques:

    Comparisons of EE of stationary and physical activities measured by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated by different methods during a semi-standardized protocol.

    Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings

    doi: 10.3390/s150306133

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons of EE of stationary and physical activities measured by COSMED K4b 2 (indirect calorimetry) and estimated by different methods during a semi-standardized protocol.

    Article Snippet: The accuracy of AGthigh + Acti4 and Actiheart was better than ActivPAL, ActiGraph and AGhip + Acti4 for estimating physical activity EE at group level in the semi-standardized protocol.

    Techniques:

    Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the stationary activity types lying, sitting and standing in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip+Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh+Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), full line the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear correlation plot of the individual scatter plots and R 2 -value ( R 2 ) the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear correlation line.

    Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings

    doi: 10.3390/s150306133

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the stationary activity types lying, sitting and standing in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip+Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh+Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), full line the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear correlation plot of the individual scatter plots and R 2 -value ( R 2 ) the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear correlation line.

    Article Snippet: The accuracy of AGthigh + Acti4 and Actiheart was better than ActivPAL, ActiGraph and AGhip + Acti4 for estimating physical activity EE at group level in the semi-standardized protocol.

    Techniques: Activity Assay

    Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the physical activity types walking, running, cycling and walking stairs in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods: ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip + Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh + Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), solid line represents the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear regression between EE by COSMED and difference between EE estimated by different methods and COSMED. R 2 is the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear regression line.

    Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

    Article Title: Validation of Five Minimally Obstructive Methods to Estimate Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Young Adults in Semi-Standardized Settings

    doi: 10.3390/s150306133

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots of the EE estimated in the physical activity types walking, running, cycling and walking stairs in the semi-standardized protocol of the methods: ( a ) ActivPAL; ( b ) ActiGraph; ( c ) Actiheart; ( d ) AGhip + Acti4 and ( e ): AGthigh + Acti4. Dashed lines represent the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), solid line represents the mean difference between estimated and measured EE. The thin line represents the linear regression between EE by COSMED and difference between EE estimated by different methods and COSMED. R 2 is the Pearson coefficient of determination of individual scatter plots to this linear regression line.

    Article Snippet: The accuracy of AGthigh + Acti4 and Actiheart was better than ActivPAL, ActiGraph and AGhip + Acti4 for estimating physical activity EE at group level in the semi-standardized protocol.

    Techniques: Activity Assay